← Back to Blog

Why SPO Isn’t As Mysterious As It Sounds

Buyers
7
minutes
Technical Level
November 6, 2019
7
minutes
November 6, 2019
Technical Level
Curt Larson
Chief Product Officer
You’ve likely been hearing a lot about SPO lately.  In this article I’d like to lay out some clear and simple steps marketers, agencies and trading desks can take on the road to SPO.  

While you can do a lot of sophisticated SPO work, as with most things in life, you can get 80% of the results with 20% of the effort and focus on that last 20% later.  These simple steps are pulled from my experience in SPO tech work as a primary author on numerous relevant specs like app-ads.txt and secure bid requests (ads.cert) as well as a member of the IAB Tech Lab’s Commit Group overseeing all specs.  

If you’re confused about why SPO is the topic du jour lately, these two articles on what led us to SPO and on the latest developments enabling SPO will give you some background.

First, what is the goal of SPO?  In a word: de-averaging.  Today as a buyer you are purchasing a mix of inventory from various sources and you see the average performance.  You are likely already accustomed to de-averaging on things like domain, device, or geo to find and optimize to top performance.  You’re likely not de-averaging on things like exchange or reseller path.  SPO is simply about including the supply path in the list of vectors on which you optimize.

So, what is actually happening on the ground today?  Mostly, I’ve seen that buyers have begun exchange audits and whitelisting of exchanges.  Whitelisting exchanges that implement business policies you agree with does make sense, but I wouldn’t suggest taking it too far - for example deciding on one exchange per format is likely missing significant inventory and denying you the opportunity to experiment and learn across exchanges.  If you haven’t had conversations with your exchanges yet about transparency, take rates, what they do to create value, the directness of their inventory, etc I’d suggest you start with that and whittle your list of exchanges down to a handful for each format.  That gives you a better handle on things and you’re not likely missing out on much if any inventory.

Moving Past Exchange Short-Lists

The following are some recommended practices as you begin to think more about SPO

  • Pull an exchange-level report - most buyers have never looked at performance by exchange - pull up that data in your DSP and see what is happening in terms of relative performance on a cost-per-action and whether your budget is following the performance.
  • Exchange-level path optimization - once you have a handle on relative exchange performance, blacklist bad performers and/or consider allocating budget specifically to higher-performing exchanges.  Pulling this data varies by DSP - here’s how to do it in The Trade Desk, DV360, and Xandr.  This is easy and can be VERY effective - this is most likely to be that 80% solution you can implement NOW.
  • Look beyond the exchange - most exchanges buy from a variety of inventory sources, and this data is now available via sellers.json and the supply chain object.  The tools aren’t necessarily easy for leveraging this data yet, but innovative buyers are looking at it, and some companies are building tools to help, chiefly Jounce Media, which also provides some really interesting public data on their site.  For now, this data isn’t easily actionable, but you can build out custom bidders to utilize or use this data to inform which exchanges you buy on or ask your exchanges to create deals for you.
  • Don’t blindly cut all resellers - While it’s tempting to eliminate buying resold inventory, reselling comes in many flavors.  In some cases, particularly for midsize publishers, they may work with publisher networks who handle their monetization.  In this case the only way to buy that inventory is via reselling.  More sophisticated analysis, again such as that done by Jounce Media and others, looks at whether a path is “the most direct possible”.  Even this may not lead a buyer to the best outcome as a particular reseller may enhance the transaction in such a way as to make it worth the extra hop.  It’s best to look at performance by path and not worry so much about reselling or not.
  • Consider unique ad formats - Don’t forget about the creative and the user - the actual creative shown on the page at the end of the day can vary dramatically by path.  In the sea of data it’s easy to forget about this - although it should ultimately show up in the performance data.
  • Run small tests - You may find you don’t necessarily have the data on performance by path.  To gather that, consider broad always-on campaigns to gather data - you could run a small budget always-on campaign with open targeting and use that to learn about the performance of various paths.  This can be a useful input to your strategy.  Your DSP partner may also be willing to share some level of this data with you.

While those are a lot of ideas, I want to again emphasize that you’ll likely get some big benefits from simply looking at cost-per performance by exchange and allocating spend accordingly.  Ultimately being perfect on SPO isn’t necessary to get some benefits from it.

So What's Next?

First, DSPs are getting in the game.  The initiatives helping with transparency - ads.txt, sellers.json, and supply chain object were all pioneered by DSPs.  As I write, The Trade Desk is stepping up their already aggressive push for transparency via the supply chain object.  The DSPs are taking two strategies: 1) take unilateral action to completely block buyers from purchasing certain bad or highly unknown paths, and 2) giving buyers information and control, for example through The Trade Desk’s Gold Standard and MediaMath’s SOURCE initiative.  So far, Google seems to be playing catchup and has yet to even publish a sellers.json file, but this will undoubtedly change, particularly given they were a pioneer in forcing ads.txt adoption two years ago.  

The more prominence these initiatives gain, the more they will benefit the entire ecosystem, even those slow in adoption.  The most complex, inefficient, or fraudulent supply paths are likely to refine their operations or go out of business, inadvertently cleaning up the paths for everyone.  

So, your DSP may help you, but ultimately buyers need to take the reins.  The ideas in this article are a good place to start, and several consulting companies such as Jounce mentioned above and other entities can help buyers get more sophisticated.  Perhaps new types of companies will spring up as layers on top of buying platforms to help provide guidance or custom bidding algorithms.  In an example from a completely different industry, a website and browser plugin called AlgoTransparency attempts to clarify to the user what is really happening when they use common sites with recommendation algorithms - for example helping users understand they are being recommended increasingly extreme YouTube videos because YouTube’s algorithm has optimized for watch time.  Perhaps these sorts of tools will emerge for ad buyers.  Imagine for example based on the boxes you check in your DSP the software alerting you “Did you know the options you’ve selected will mostly target annoying popups on a reseller ad network that usually create negative brand perception?”  

While this is a lot of ad tech inside baseball, I want to conclude by re-grounding in the fundamental “Why?”  To me, there are two core drivers.  One, as an advertiser you want the best possible performance at the lowest cost from your ads.  Wasting money on inefficient or fraudulent supply paths won’t accomplish that, and won’t let you offer the best product at the best price to the most customers.  Without SPO, as a buyer you are likely purchasing a mix of great and terrible performance, and just seeing the averaged result.  Second, we all have a vested interest in the ad-funded internet continuing to thrive.  By simplifying supply chains, more money will tend to flow to real publishers and allow the open and free internet to continue to thrive.

To view the free infographic, fill the form below.

You’ve likely been hearing a lot about SPO lately.  In this article I’d like to lay out some clear and simple steps marketers, agencies and trading desks can take on the road to SPO.  

While you can do a lot of sophisticated SPO work, as with most things in life, you can get 80% of the results with 20% of the effort and focus on that last 20% later.  These simple steps are pulled from my experience in SPO tech work as a primary author on numerous relevant specs like app-ads.txt and secure bid requests (ads.cert) as well as a member of the IAB Tech Lab’s Commit Group overseeing all specs.  

If you’re confused about why SPO is the topic du jour lately, these two articles on what led us to SPO and on the latest developments enabling SPO will give you some background.

First, what is the goal of SPO?  In a word: de-averaging.  Today as a buyer you are purchasing a mix of inventory from various sources and you see the average performance.  You are likely already accustomed to de-averaging on things like domain, device, or geo to find and optimize to top performance.  You’re likely not de-averaging on things like exchange or reseller path.  SPO is simply about including the supply path in the list of vectors on which you optimize.

So, what is actually happening on the ground today?  Mostly, I’ve seen that buyers have begun exchange audits and whitelisting of exchanges.  Whitelisting exchanges that implement business policies you agree with does make sense, but I wouldn’t suggest taking it too far - for example deciding on one exchange per format is likely missing significant inventory and denying you the opportunity to experiment and learn across exchanges.  If you haven’t had conversations with your exchanges yet about transparency, take rates, what they do to create value, the directness of their inventory, etc I’d suggest you start with that and whittle your list of exchanges down to a handful for each format.  That gives you a better handle on things and you’re not likely missing out on much if any inventory.

Moving Past Exchange Short-Lists

The following are some recommended practices as you begin to think more about SPO

  • Pull an exchange-level report - most buyers have never looked at performance by exchange - pull up that data in your DSP and see what is happening in terms of relative performance on a cost-per-action and whether your budget is following the performance.
  • Exchange-level path optimization - once you have a handle on relative exchange performance, blacklist bad performers and/or consider allocating budget specifically to higher-performing exchanges.  Pulling this data varies by DSP - here’s how to do it in The Trade Desk, DV360, and Xandr.  This is easy and can be VERY effective - this is most likely to be that 80% solution you can implement NOW.
  • Look beyond the exchange - most exchanges buy from a variety of inventory sources, and this data is now available via sellers.json and the supply chain object.  The tools aren’t necessarily easy for leveraging this data yet, but innovative buyers are looking at it, and some companies are building tools to help, chiefly Jounce Media, which also provides some really interesting public data on their site.  For now, this data isn’t easily actionable, but you can build out custom bidders to utilize or use this data to inform which exchanges you buy on or ask your exchanges to create deals for you.
  • Don’t blindly cut all resellers - While it’s tempting to eliminate buying resold inventory, reselling comes in many flavors.  In some cases, particularly for midsize publishers, they may work with publisher networks who handle their monetization.  In this case the only way to buy that inventory is via reselling.  More sophisticated analysis, again such as that done by Jounce Media and others, looks at whether a path is “the most direct possible”.  Even this may not lead a buyer to the best outcome as a particular reseller may enhance the transaction in such a way as to make it worth the extra hop.  It’s best to look at performance by path and not worry so much about reselling or not.
  • Consider unique ad formats - Don’t forget about the creative and the user - the actual creative shown on the page at the end of the day can vary dramatically by path.  In the sea of data it’s easy to forget about this - although it should ultimately show up in the performance data.
  • Run small tests - You may find you don’t necessarily have the data on performance by path.  To gather that, consider broad always-on campaigns to gather data - you could run a small budget always-on campaign with open targeting and use that to learn about the performance of various paths.  This can be a useful input to your strategy.  Your DSP partner may also be willing to share some level of this data with you.

While those are a lot of ideas, I want to again emphasize that you’ll likely get some big benefits from simply looking at cost-per performance by exchange and allocating spend accordingly.  Ultimately being perfect on SPO isn’t necessary to get some benefits from it.

So What's Next?

First, DSPs are getting in the game.  The initiatives helping with transparency - ads.txt, sellers.json, and supply chain object were all pioneered by DSPs.  As I write, The Trade Desk is stepping up their already aggressive push for transparency via the supply chain object.  The DSPs are taking two strategies: 1) take unilateral action to completely block buyers from purchasing certain bad or highly unknown paths, and 2) giving buyers information and control, for example through The Trade Desk’s Gold Standard and MediaMath’s SOURCE initiative.  So far, Google seems to be playing catchup and has yet to even publish a sellers.json file, but this will undoubtedly change, particularly given they were a pioneer in forcing ads.txt adoption two years ago.  

The more prominence these initiatives gain, the more they will benefit the entire ecosystem, even those slow in adoption.  The most complex, inefficient, or fraudulent supply paths are likely to refine their operations or go out of business, inadvertently cleaning up the paths for everyone.  

So, your DSP may help you, but ultimately buyers need to take the reins.  The ideas in this article are a good place to start, and several consulting companies such as Jounce mentioned above and other entities can help buyers get more sophisticated.  Perhaps new types of companies will spring up as layers on top of buying platforms to help provide guidance or custom bidding algorithms.  In an example from a completely different industry, a website and browser plugin called AlgoTransparency attempts to clarify to the user what is really happening when they use common sites with recommendation algorithms - for example helping users understand they are being recommended increasingly extreme YouTube videos because YouTube’s algorithm has optimized for watch time.  Perhaps these sorts of tools will emerge for ad buyers.  Imagine for example based on the boxes you check in your DSP the software alerting you “Did you know the options you’ve selected will mostly target annoying popups on a reseller ad network that usually create negative brand perception?”  

While this is a lot of ad tech inside baseball, I want to conclude by re-grounding in the fundamental “Why?”  To me, there are two core drivers.  One, as an advertiser you want the best possible performance at the lowest cost from your ads.  Wasting money on inefficient or fraudulent supply paths won’t accomplish that, and won’t let you offer the best product at the best price to the most customers.  Without SPO, as a buyer you are likely purchasing a mix of great and terrible performance, and just seeing the averaged result.  Second, we all have a vested interest in the ad-funded internet continuing to thrive.  By simplifying supply chains, more money will tend to flow to real publishers and allow the open and free internet to continue to thrive.

No items found.
About Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech—

Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech is a short 3-minute podcast exploring the news in the digital advertising industry. Ad tech is a fast-growing industry with many updates happening daily. As it can be hard for most to keep up with the latest news, the Sharethrough team wanted to create an audio series compiling notable mentions each week.

You’ve likely been hearing a lot about SPO lately.  In this article I’d like to lay out some clear and simple steps marketers, agencies and trading desks can take on the road to SPO.  

While you can do a lot of sophisticated SPO work, as with most things in life, you can get 80% of the results with 20% of the effort and focus on that last 20% later.  These simple steps are pulled from my experience in SPO tech work as a primary author on numerous relevant specs like app-ads.txt and secure bid requests (ads.cert) as well as a member of the IAB Tech Lab’s Commit Group overseeing all specs.  

If you’re confused about why SPO is the topic du jour lately, these two articles on what led us to SPO and on the latest developments enabling SPO will give you some background.

First, what is the goal of SPO?  In a word: de-averaging.  Today as a buyer you are purchasing a mix of inventory from various sources and you see the average performance.  You are likely already accustomed to de-averaging on things like domain, device, or geo to find and optimize to top performance.  You’re likely not de-averaging on things like exchange or reseller path.  SPO is simply about including the supply path in the list of vectors on which you optimize.

So, what is actually happening on the ground today?  Mostly, I’ve seen that buyers have begun exchange audits and whitelisting of exchanges.  Whitelisting exchanges that implement business policies you agree with does make sense, but I wouldn’t suggest taking it too far - for example deciding on one exchange per format is likely missing significant inventory and denying you the opportunity to experiment and learn across exchanges.  If you haven’t had conversations with your exchanges yet about transparency, take rates, what they do to create value, the directness of their inventory, etc I’d suggest you start with that and whittle your list of exchanges down to a handful for each format.  That gives you a better handle on things and you’re not likely missing out on much if any inventory.

Moving Past Exchange Short-Lists

The following are some recommended practices as you begin to think more about SPO

  • Pull an exchange-level report - most buyers have never looked at performance by exchange - pull up that data in your DSP and see what is happening in terms of relative performance on a cost-per-action and whether your budget is following the performance.
  • Exchange-level path optimization - once you have a handle on relative exchange performance, blacklist bad performers and/or consider allocating budget specifically to higher-performing exchanges.  Pulling this data varies by DSP - here’s how to do it in The Trade Desk, DV360, and Xandr.  This is easy and can be VERY effective - this is most likely to be that 80% solution you can implement NOW.
  • Look beyond the exchange - most exchanges buy from a variety of inventory sources, and this data is now available via sellers.json and the supply chain object.  The tools aren’t necessarily easy for leveraging this data yet, but innovative buyers are looking at it, and some companies are building tools to help, chiefly Jounce Media, which also provides some really interesting public data on their site.  For now, this data isn’t easily actionable, but you can build out custom bidders to utilize or use this data to inform which exchanges you buy on or ask your exchanges to create deals for you.
  • Don’t blindly cut all resellers - While it’s tempting to eliminate buying resold inventory, reselling comes in many flavors.  In some cases, particularly for midsize publishers, they may work with publisher networks who handle their monetization.  In this case the only way to buy that inventory is via reselling.  More sophisticated analysis, again such as that done by Jounce Media and others, looks at whether a path is “the most direct possible”.  Even this may not lead a buyer to the best outcome as a particular reseller may enhance the transaction in such a way as to make it worth the extra hop.  It’s best to look at performance by path and not worry so much about reselling or not.
  • Consider unique ad formats - Don’t forget about the creative and the user - the actual creative shown on the page at the end of the day can vary dramatically by path.  In the sea of data it’s easy to forget about this - although it should ultimately show up in the performance data.
  • Run small tests - You may find you don’t necessarily have the data on performance by path.  To gather that, consider broad always-on campaigns to gather data - you could run a small budget always-on campaign with open targeting and use that to learn about the performance of various paths.  This can be a useful input to your strategy.  Your DSP partner may also be willing to share some level of this data with you.

While those are a lot of ideas, I want to again emphasize that you’ll likely get some big benefits from simply looking at cost-per performance by exchange and allocating spend accordingly.  Ultimately being perfect on SPO isn’t necessary to get some benefits from it.

So What's Next?

First, DSPs are getting in the game.  The initiatives helping with transparency - ads.txt, sellers.json, and supply chain object were all pioneered by DSPs.  As I write, The Trade Desk is stepping up their already aggressive push for transparency via the supply chain object.  The DSPs are taking two strategies: 1) take unilateral action to completely block buyers from purchasing certain bad or highly unknown paths, and 2) giving buyers information and control, for example through The Trade Desk’s Gold Standard and MediaMath’s SOURCE initiative.  So far, Google seems to be playing catchup and has yet to even publish a sellers.json file, but this will undoubtedly change, particularly given they were a pioneer in forcing ads.txt adoption two years ago.  

The more prominence these initiatives gain, the more they will benefit the entire ecosystem, even those slow in adoption.  The most complex, inefficient, or fraudulent supply paths are likely to refine their operations or go out of business, inadvertently cleaning up the paths for everyone.  

So, your DSP may help you, but ultimately buyers need to take the reins.  The ideas in this article are a good place to start, and several consulting companies such as Jounce mentioned above and other entities can help buyers get more sophisticated.  Perhaps new types of companies will spring up as layers on top of buying platforms to help provide guidance or custom bidding algorithms.  In an example from a completely different industry, a website and browser plugin called AlgoTransparency attempts to clarify to the user what is really happening when they use common sites with recommendation algorithms - for example helping users understand they are being recommended increasingly extreme YouTube videos because YouTube’s algorithm has optimized for watch time.  Perhaps these sorts of tools will emerge for ad buyers.  Imagine for example based on the boxes you check in your DSP the software alerting you “Did you know the options you’ve selected will mostly target annoying popups on a reseller ad network that usually create negative brand perception?”  

While this is a lot of ad tech inside baseball, I want to conclude by re-grounding in the fundamental “Why?”  To me, there are two core drivers.  One, as an advertiser you want the best possible performance at the lowest cost from your ads.  Wasting money on inefficient or fraudulent supply paths won’t accomplish that, and won’t let you offer the best product at the best price to the most customers.  Without SPO, as a buyer you are likely purchasing a mix of great and terrible performance, and just seeing the averaged result.  Second, we all have a vested interest in the ad-funded internet continuing to thrive.  By simplifying supply chains, more money will tend to flow to real publishers and allow the open and free internet to continue to thrive.

About Calibrate—

Founded in 2015, Calibrate is a yearly conference for new engineering managers hosted by seasoned engineering managers. The experience level of the speakers ranges from newcomers all the way through senior engineering leaders with over twenty years of experience in the field. Each speaker is greatly concerned about the craft of engineering management. Organized and hosted by Sharethrough, it was conducted yearly in September, from 2015-2019 in San Francisco, California.

Stay Up-to-Date—

Subscribe to our newsletter and receive cutting-edge digital advertising insights, including our weekly Behind Headlines episodes, delivered right to your inbox.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Listen to Next—
3:00
November 19, 2021
Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech — Secrecy & Augmented Reality
This week in Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech we’re chatting about secret ad buyers, a new partnership, and augmented reality.
3:00
November 12, 2021
Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech — Connected TVs & Digital Publishers
This week in Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech we’re talking about Connected TV ads and print publishers going digital.
3:00
November 5, 2021
Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech — Metaverses & Social TV
This week in Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech we’re chatting about a new metaverse entry, social platforms on TV, and ad experiences.
Watch Next—
3:00
July 2, 2021
Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech — Delayed Cookies & Investments
This week in Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech we’re talking about the delay in the depreciation of third-party cookies & news on IPOs.
3:00
June 25, 2021
Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech — Power Plays & Privacy
This week in Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech we’re taking a look at the role of competition and key player’s growing dominance.
3:00
June 18 2021
Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech — Lawsuits & Set Backs In Addressability
This week in Behind Headlines: 180 Seconds in Ad Tech we’re talking about the rise in privacy and addressability, from lawsuits to setbacks.
Curt Larson
Chief Product Officer

About the Author

Curt Larson has over 20 years of career experience in technology and product management. After spending 5 years at Deloitte Consulting managing large-scale systems implementation projects, he led the rollout of new mobile handsets and services for Vodafone Japan. He then moved to Silicon Valley and led several product management teams, including as a founding employee at Jibe mobile (now Google), growing and taking RingCentral public, and 10 years at Sharethrough, where he led the creation of the first native exchange and guided Sharethrough to a programmatic business model. He has co-authored numerous programmatic specs with the IAB and is active in the industry. He has experience leading product, UX, analytics, business development, operations, marketing, publisher sales and engineering. He sits on the board of the directors of the IAB Tech Lab, helping guide their work to support the industry through technology standards and solutions.

More from this author
Notification Image

Sharethrough & Equativ are Merging!

Together, we form one of the largest independent ad platforms and marketplaces worldwide.

Learn More →